Clarifying Some Points Made In the Last Few Posts

Clarifying Some Points Made In the Last Few Posts

 

I believe there are several things which must be established as we go forward here.  Before we do, I would note that I am sharing my insights from my field experience and research as I learn- some of my insights and research into matters are older before blogging about it, true, that just means I have kept my mouth shut until now.  As author John Lamb Lash has said, (author of "Not In His Image- Sacred Ecology and the Future Of Belief"), a true person teaches what he is learning.  However, if one goes back into my blog you will realize I have always been sharing links to Manly P. Hall lectures for years, or sharing mathematical revelations about the global phenomenon of the Megalith builders by providing links to presentations such as "The Code."

 

As John Keel established in his book, "Our Haunted Planet" (1971), there are really only three acceptable theories for the origin of our species.  One is Creationism, the second is Darwin's theory of Evolution, and the third is something like the "Ancient Astronaut" theory, in other words, we were seeded here from somewhere else.  Keel in his book argues to make the case that we, the human species, are a result of all three.  I will not go into it here now, but I recommend reading the book "Everything You Know Is Wrong" by Lloyd Pye for more insights into this subject.  My own opinion is, however, that there are holes in the "missing link" theory, etc.  John Keel in the aforementioned book states that fossils of fully modern man have been found alongside Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal remains within the same vicinity- in other words there are, and have been, different hominid species, including modern man, living amongst one another for thousands, possibly millions of years, and that these different species do not necessarily represent different rungs of the evolutionary scale of the same species.  Any logical, forward thinking man should be able to grasp this.  Another clue to this can be found in the Hebrew/ Christian Bible, in the Old Testament of Genesis.  What I am about to share I have heard from several sources, but the researcher that comes to mind who seems to reference it the most is researcher Jordan Maxwell.  The original Hebrew translation is that the Elohim, which is a plural usage, progenated the human species.  In other words, "God" did not create us according to the correct translation of the Genesis account, but the "Gods."  The Bible even says in the English translation "Come, let US make Man in OUR image, after OUR likeness."  For an earlier account of the Creation story which preceded the Hebrew scribe's version, I would recommend Zacharia Sitchin's interpretation of the ancient Sumerian cuneiform tablets which he researched and put together in his "Earth Chronicles"  series (the books "The 12th Planet, When Time Began", etc.)  There are many other references in the Bible along these same lines, and as Sitchin's work has revealed, it is even strikingly more obvious from the older sources, where they still exist.

 

This story of "the Gods" would certainly extend to the Greek (see Hesiod's "Works and Days"), the Tuatha De Dannan of the Celts, and the Scandinavian gods such as Thor And Loki.  A lot of these gods apparently utilized some kind of obscure technology- for example, Loki's ring he wore was supposed to emit some kind of laser force.  Well, we have to ask ourselves the question: what kind of a ring did he wear?  Was it a gold ring?  After all, if it were a gold ring, then gold is the strongest conductor of electricity we know of.  Even the later Kings and aristocracy wore gold rings and jewelry, although for the most part, the technology was lost-- they were just imitating the gods.  After speaking to a co-worker versed in Norse mythology (I work in a warehouse) I had to ask myself these questions about Loki's ring.  However, in his book "One Hundred Thousand Years of Man's Unknown History" author Robert Charroux gives an account of the use of an electric lamp in the 14th or 15th century, used in the residence of somebody within the King's inner court (I do not have the book in front of me for reference.)  This makes one wonder whether or not Benjamin Franklin ever really discovered anything, or rather, more likely, he and his cohorts probably thought it the correct time to make such revelations known to the public at large.

 

In his book "Legacy of the Gods" Robert Charroux defines a term he coined, which is Primohistory.  What is primohistory?  Charroux says, "by primohistory I mean that period in the life of the human race which precedes protohistory and is parallel to prehistory but differs in it that it presupposes the existence of advanced civilizations."  This brings us around to the point I was making in the last post- we must discern what we can between the older, pre-deluvian (Atlantean) civilizations, the pre-colonial Native civlilizations, and the works of the historic colonists themselves.  This can be tricky, which should be obvious.  One point that a lot of people do not understand is how spiritual in nature the American Indian could/can be- he was an animist; everything had life, had spirit.  Of course the Ceremonial Stone Landscape exists within a Native American context.  In the last post, I already gave my opinion about the Stone Chambers, that they may not be exclusively Native American in origin, and that there is a striking Celtic parallel.  The older researchers such as William B. Goodwin and Berry Fell actually have good insight in some areas, although they may have been wrong about some things.  Also, when I see, for example, a series of ancient Stone Pyramid mounds in extreme ruin by Echo Lake in Hopkinton, MA., of which there are many, some over 30 feet high, I am not so sure this is the work of Native people within the last few thousand years.  This would clearly be a tradition harkening back to the lost time of Atlantis.  There are also such pyramids, and also man-made causeways in the swamps of Holliston- this is much more than a cairn field or Manitou effigy left behind by the Native culture.  I think it is easy enough to understand my point, especially if one has already read and understood what I have already written.  And, for some reason, these very important sites, of large stone and earth pyramids, are usually left out of the inventory of sites which is being collected, which brings us to the point of the Band-Aid solution.

 

As far as the Stone Chambers are concerned, the Band-Aid solution (or problem, we should say) is this: archaeologists used to assert that the Stone Chambers were nothing more than colonial root cellars.  Now, certain Chambers, such as the Upton Chamber, have yielded pre-colonial radiocarbon dates.  With the advent of the awareness of the Native American Ceremonial Stone Landscape which exists, it is easy enough, since the Stone Chambers still pose a problem to historians, to put a new Band-Aid on the problem, and the real history may never be known.

 

I recently got a book acquired after I made the last couple of posts, published recently (maybe 2018) called "An Invitation to Celtic Wisdom."  In it the author made the point that to the ancients, the lands beyond the west, across the ocean was TirNanOg.  He then flatly makes the statement which was something like, (and here I am paraphrasing) "of course, today we know that there is no such TirNanOg, and a traveler will find themselves instead arriving in New York or Boston."  Okay, wow!  This author is from Georgia and may not know about the New England Stone Chambers which also exist in neighboring Putnam County, New York, and their parallel to the Celtic Stone Chambers of the Old World.  Perhaps I should write a letter to this author and say, "by the way, did you know that the modern NewYork/Boston area may in fact be the ancient TirNanOg...?"  But I digress.  Anyway, the author of this Celtic Wisdom book seems like a good guy and there is a lot of good stuff in his book, it is worth the read.

 

However, the pendulum swings both ways.  In his book "Witches- the Investigation of An Ancient Religion" TC Lethbridge made the point that certain skulls found in western Europe which dated back to the Upper Paleolithic period resembled those of a modern Eskimo.  He brought this up to illustrate the point that "it is not fanciful therefore to note comparisons between the folk-lore of Eskimos and things we can infer from archaeological research done on the contents of the Paleolithic caves in Europe."  The strange thing about this statement is that it sounds like TC Lethbridge may have been describing the Picts.  Just who were the Picts?  We don't really know for sure, perhaps they were the "little dark people" of Old Europe, such as in Ireland.  It is a funny thing for sure, because many people with occult leanings have stated again and again that certain writers (HG Wells for instance) seem to have their finger on some kind of a truth- for example, HG Wells predicted the advancement of certain fields in the sciences before these revolutions actually happened.  I personally believe that the author Robert E. Howard, the creator of "Conan" was such a person, although he wrote within the context of pre-deluvian fantasy epics.  For instance, Atlantis played into his writings.  The way a Pict is described in his work, one would think he is describing an American Indian person.  It is true too that the later depictions of "Picts" in the illustrated Marvel Magazine "The Savage Sword of Conan"  look strikingly AmerIndian.  Another such a person would have been JRR Tolkien, who was an Oxford University professor.  Tolkien fictionalized his researches into Atlantis and pre-history when he wrote his Lord Of the Rings.  Some people have even compared the recent photo of a Black Hole that was just published the other week for the first time to Tolkien's "Eye of Sauron."  It is very true that there are a great many metaphysical things, some benign, some malignant, which affect our human species.  Another thing to start thinking about is things like Quantum Physics, holographic universe theories, etc.

 

I think I have said and explained what I wanted to for now.  Please stay tuned for the next post.